Identity statement area
Reference TypeConference Paper (Conference Proceedings)
Last Update2015: (UTC)
Metadata Last Update2020: (UTC) administrator
Citation KeyLinaresBoteRodrBati:2015:AdErMe
TitleAn Adjustable Error Measure for Image Segmentation Evaluation
Access Date2022, Jan. 21
Number of Files1
Size497 KiB
Context area
Author1 Linares, Oscar Cuadros
2 Botelho, Glenda
3 Rodrigues, Francisco
4 Batista Neto, João
Affiliation1 University of São Paulo
2 Universidade Federal do Tocantins
3 University of São Paulo
4 University of São Paulo
EditorPapa, João Paulo
Sander, Pedro Vieira
Marroquim, Ricardo Guerra
Farrell, Ryan
Conference NameConference on Graphics, Patterns and Images, 28 (SIBGRAPI)
Conference LocationSalvador
DateAug. 26-29, 2015
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Publisher CityLos Alamitos
Book TitleProceedings
Tertiary TypeFull Paper
History (UTC)2015-06-24 21:28:53 :: -> administrator ::
2020-02-19 02:14:04 :: administrator -> :: 2015
Content and structure area
Is the master or a copy?is the master
Content Stagecompleted
Content TypeExternal Contribution
Keywordserror measure
image segmentation
AbstractDue to the subjective nature of the segmentation process, quantitative evaluation of image segmentation methods is still a difficult task. Humans perceive image objects in different ways. Consequently, human segmentations may come in different levels of refinement, ie, under- and over-segmentations. Popular segmentation error measures in the literature (Arbelaez and OCE) are supervised methods (also called empirical discrepancy methods), in which error is computed by comparing objects in segmentations with a reference (ground-truth) image produced by humans. Since reference images can be many, the key issue for a segmentation error measure is to be consistent in the presence of both under- and over-segmentation. In general, the term consistency refers to the ability of the error measure to be low, when comparing similar segmentations, or high, when faced with different segmentations, while capturing under- or over-segmentations. In this paper we propose a new object-based empirical discrepancy error measure, called Adjustable Object- based Measure (AOM). We introduce a penalty parameter which gives the method the ability to be more (or less) responsive in the presence of over-segmentation. Hence, we extend the notion of consistency so as to include the applications need in the process. Some applications require segmentation to be extremely accurate, hence under- or over-segmentation should be well penalised. Others, do not. By changing the penalty parameter, AOM can deliver more consistent results not only in reference to the under- or over-segmentation issue alone, but also according to the nature of the application. We compare our method with Arbelaez (used as standard measure in the benchmark of Berkeley Segmentation Image Dataset) and OCE. Our results show that AOM not only is more consistent in the presence of over-segmentation, but is also faster to compute. Unlike Arbelaez and OCE, AOM also satisfies the metric axiom of symmetry. > SDLA > SIBGRAPI 2015 > An Adjustable Error...
doc Directory Contentaccess
source Directory Contentthere are no files
agreement Directory Content
agreement.html 24/06/2015 18:28 0.7 KiB 
Conditions of access and use area
data URL
zipped data URL
Target FilePID3768029.pdf
Update Permissionnot transferred
Allied materials area
Next Higher Units8JMKD3MGPBW34M/3K24PF8
Notes area
Empty Fieldsaccessionnumber archivingpolicy archivist area callnumber copyholder copyright creatorhistory descriptionlevel dissemination doi edition electronicmailaddress group holdercode isbn issn label lineage mark nextedition notes numberofvolumes orcid organization pages parameterlist parentrepositories previousedition previouslowerunit progress project readergroup readpermission resumeid rightsholder secondarydate secondarykey secondarymark secondarytype serieseditor session shorttitle sponsor subject tertiarymark type url versiontype volume